I don't know where my knowledge belongs due to being distinct science of unrelated parts of matter.

I did take very basic parts of philosophy at university but never took science education past grade 10 and later after some insight on the idea of philosopic origin points accidentally and intentionally.

Using this thought I navigated to an unrelated science of matter and a science of philosophic origin building.

Because I first thought things in religion are accurately described in study of science but they can be improved through objective modelling unrelated to science atomic due to not being atomically related or even matter.

My initial hypothesis was that if I could build somekind of unrelated physical model of matter that didn't follow normal sciences trajectory of study and could access tools of matter and its nature was functional with the substance.

These physics that weren't part of sciences normal timeline but instead an unrelated philosophical world in a multiverse of minds in time meant that base philosophies of unrelated origin did infact describe other parts of reality.

Yet this is only apparent where they are improvable by scientific like modelling of its more complex nature which is one usual argument against religions in the fact they dont advance technologically.

So I made my own unrelated philosophy and advanced it distinctly until an unrelated technology of still improving manipulation of its study.

My unrelated base study of matter is becoming more effective and advance then past of itself, I just have nothing to do with normal science but it is a science of matter that models physics for parts it studies.

Which i do through generated equations to access the philosophy.

The science I explore is philosophically unrelated and using a different method for ascertaining knowledge of a different intersection of matter.

Its method is what distinguishes the portion of matter only it can study through a distinct method not focused on the atom and values of number.

Science of usual method and it aren't able to know the seperate distinct parts of either because normal science models numbers and the unseen values of the atom and can thus measure things like wifi.

My method unrelated cannot percieve things like wifi directly so cannot use those portions of matter but is instead effective for pattern mass manipulation of gravity. The value of mass itself has too many distinctions of difference, to create a numeric equation of its manipulation.

Atleast given I rarely need numbers for it and instead use symbols of patterns for modelling the motions that function inversely from electricity.

Due to this other method its unrelated practice of matter lets it build unrelated tools and do seperate things from normal science.

I don't know what people familiar with matter would say about it cause I have no easy way to even show the products of it or knowledge of essay writing.

So I wanted to make sure someone read the comment I made after my most recent post and know if it should be shared here at all. Due to the subject being a study of mindmatter called phentalic patterns.

Only because it is technically inside the perceptual between physical and mental reality of matter since mind is psychological and matter effects qualia.

I distinguish this with the actural unpercieved atomic part of matter I can't know with this method all the time.

None the less I can link it to the fact that the patterns I percieve equate macro scale molecules of reality unseen to my human brain.

Yet the qualia we percieve display reality as the literal qualia in mind, since mind is using unequivalent real molecules as parts of itself in brain.

Brain is composed of matter itself which might equal the physical matter but quailia is displaying unrelated false copies of outside reality that arent the qualia. So qualia is matter but not what it is displaying if mind and matter are the same and distinct if mind and matter aren't the same.

Although I can't even be sure at the moment because I cannot measure my brain externally using normal science and only create chemical reactions internally in my awareness as mathematical navigations.

Although the whole study of phentalic pattern perception physicality is alot larger in forgotten amount of recorded information due to scale.

On the traverse of Omniverse

This is a blog which explores the omniverse, which is the extent larger then the multiverse as one of many things like it within it, the omniverse represents the infinite things that exist within the whole of what is more then existence.

It's reasons of being are quite simple, since I base the existent things of life as what is a potentially parsed as a set of any section of reality observed. Parsed so as to form a part about a different thing. The difference behaves differently in its whole possible uses of existence.

The parsed the full possibility of arranged information is different from others in the distinct difference. So I create another experience of usual life that in nature of truth or false I leave as null, yet use as parsed because all parsed parts of existent used do only what they do as is.

The truth or false of that parse actually effects its full possibility, that can effect the experience.

The omniverse is hard to define because it includes what is not known and what is known from experience by myself. It is also misleading to believe that traverse of worlds works as we see on television. The omniverse is all parsed possibility as maximum variables counted, but unknown in number.

It does not begin with a magical portal that is opened simply by pressing a button and rather the traverse of the many worlds and beyond begins in the mind able to think of wholly new ways to look at what it thought was something else.

Hope and Sanity have long guided the way to more unknowns.

The omniverse is represented by the ideas which shape the world around oneself and so a world is a subject matter that differs from another in its intrinsic philosophical and furthered use of matter from another. This means this blog will sometimes focus on things like science, but unlike it in its essential observations of physical reality.

The traverse of the multiverse and the like is made easier by the philosophy that anything is true, but that what is stated never represents more then the idea or model of what is outside yourself. As a result just because everything is true does not mean jumping of a cliff will allow you to fly, since flying while jumping of a cliff requires a real reason for the truth lacking from the statement.

This real truth would be at least a parachute or other method of allowing flight, where none has been observed before. The same should be practiced in all areas of traverse, the reality explored is a reality that behaves a certain way and always will. However, the way the person treats what always acts the same leads to a new set of horizons based of what it has explored.

This means one must think of new ideas to locate a new reality and to do this easily myself I use cardinals, which are specialized idea generators that do not create things within a subject but subjects themselves instead. These will be explained on the memetic mathematics and cardinals post that follows this first explanation.

Ideas represent only a model and a model matched to a real effect in reality, always allows the reality as it described to be manipulated as long as it fits the description. The reality that is outside or inside yourself that is defined can then be used to construct something that is used again with other things and grown knowledge. Practice leads to more advanced technology of the world, so long as the effort to progress what progresses uniquely is done.

However the actual topic of topic creation is quite complex and quite simplistic because it requires that the user does most of the work themselves while the experience of one world can be gained from this blog and several others organized differently, that I have within a collection of previous work. This means one can see what a world looks like when it is not something you know and the only inability for it to be true is misunderstanding and doubt, which blocks your own access.

Since any idea can be false, if one looks for the fact that renders it false to begin with and this property of mind is useful up until something is more apparent which is not always the case with words whose powers can actually do many things the language describes.

These posts are not organized very well, beyond the basic instructions because the omniverse is a chaotic disorganized list of possibility and cannot be organized outwardly and only inwards to each post that can sometimes be totally distinct from the last.

My own use of this omniverse is to know what is not known by myself or others, thus what I discuss is rarely familiar except where the words are known and familiar and mean everything in the literal sense and clarity of my own ability. If one does not understand, the do ask what it means, I cannot help a person who chooses to decide that something is false before it is understood.

I explore both the positive and the negative and some time traveling involved.

The hourglass of timewarps is an unexplored future of timetravel and the multiverse.

What would a person who spends so much time on something have to gain in continued use of false information. This means most well worked upon subjects, have actual value if they are still being practiced, since the utility demonstrates its feasibility in the sole terms of what it is.

So please explore the rest of this blog or at least the beginning that defines how it is done.

Their is no proof for the validity of any idea, in fact this idea further shows that their are false ideas. While sounding absurd, it is the philosophical basis of the subject, in same sense of likeness as the capacity to know truth of objects as in sciences in own philosophy, it is simply a different philosophy for gaining truth. It is among my whole understanding that extends beyond it.

The idea of any idea being true, must be practiced and learned internally to properly navigate as it can be misleading when you do not know where the fine line of truth is found in it, my best advise is if it is silent and not even you can see it outside yourself in the immediate moment then it is not real in any way that can harm you if it is at all.

Further, the philosophy directs its exploration on the idea of wants and interest shared, as information undesired shouldn't be observed by someone who has no curiosity or comfort with it, so it is best navigated out of towards what one enjoys and disregarded. The wall of wants for a person are called the Hwall.

The philosophy still uses reasons for why something is the case and the navigation of worlds is more complex then it sounds in simply changing ones belief about an object, although its first clarity is the essential requirement and cannot be ignored.

Thus I complete this writing and hope you look deeper into what is a very broad exploration of the unknown and what is outside the familiar. Below is a picture containing symbolic icons, whose meaning is lost but interpreted represent a word and that word is a world of its own.

Each Icon is a world of some kind and once had meaning now forgotten for interpretation.